An author can log back into the Presentation Portal after they’re notified that a reviewer has left comments and/or asked them to edit their paper.
You’d set it up so that the Presentation Portal shows the paper status that the reviewer has changed it to (via the Review Portal). So if you set “Edits Required” paper status for when reviewers are sending comments back to the author, you would have to make sure that your Presentation Portal has the “Edits Required” paper status for when they need to edit.
You’d also have to make sure in the Presentation Portal that you’re showing reviewer comments. That way the author can log back into the Presentation Portal to read reviewer comments and you’ve allowed editing so they can edit their submission.
So it's those two portals essentially working together to create that process where a reviewer can send comments back and the author can resubmit – and that might answer a couple of questions.
If you are planning to have an initial stage, where all abstracts are submitted, then you plan to open reviews on a particular date, you may want to consider allowing a submitter to edit their abstract until you open reviews. If this is the case, you could make the following two settings in the presentation portal the same status as when they submit.
- When a Reviewer allows the author to Edit a Submitted Abstract the Paper Status will be
- When an Edited Abstracts is resubmitted, set the Paper Status to
This will mean they can submit, edit and resubmit their paper until such time as you change these settings when the review stage is in progress.